🔗 Share this article

The disputed, US and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) says it is terminating its aid operations in the Palestinian territory, subsequent to approximately 180 days.

The group had earlier paused its several relief locations in Gaza subsequent to the halt in hostilities between Palestinian factions and Israel came into force six weeks ago.

The GHF aimed to circumvent United Nations channels as the main supplier of aid to Gaza's population.

International relief agencies refused to co-operate with its approach, saying it was improper and dangerous.

Hundreds of Palestinians were killed while seeking food amid disorderly situations near GHF's sites, mainly through Israeli military action, according to the UN.

Israeli authorities stated its troops fired warning shots.

Operation Conclusion

The organization declared on the beginning of the week that it was winding down operations now because of the "satisfactory fulfillment of its crisis response", with a total of three million packages containing the equivalent of more than 187 million meals delivered to Palestinians.

The GHF's executive director, the executive director, further mentioned the United States-operated coordination body - which has been created to help implement US President Donald Trump's Gaza peace plan - would be "implementing and enlarging the model GHF piloted".

"GHF's model, in which militant groups were prevented from misappropriating relief supplies, played a huge role in bringing Palestinian factions to negotiations and achieving a ceasefire."

Reactions and Responses

The Palestinian faction - which refutes aid diversion claims - supported the shutdown of the humanitarian foundation, according to reports.

A spokesman for declared the organization should be held accountable for the damage it inflicted to Gazans.

"We urge all global human rights groups to ensure that it does not escape accountability after leading to casualties and wounds of numerous Palestinians and concealing the starvation policy practised by the Israeli government."

Operational Background

The foundation started work in Gaza on 26 May, a seven days following Israeli authorities had somewhat relaxed a comprehensive closure on relief and commercial goods to Gaza that persisted for nearly three months and resulted in critical deficits of vital resources.

Subsequently, a famine was declared in Gaza City.

The GHF's food distribution sites in the southern and middle regions of Gaza were operated by American private security firms and positioned in regions under Israeli military authority.

Relief Agency Issues

International organizations and their affiliates claimed the methodology violated the core assistance standards of objectivity, fairness and autonomy, and that channelling desperate people into militarised zones was fundamentally dangerous.

International human rights monitoring body said it recorded the deaths of a minimum of 859 residents attempting to obtain nourishment in the vicinity of GHF sites between spring and summer months.

A further 514 persons were killed near the courses followed by international humanitarian deliveries, it further stated.

The majority of these individuals were fatally wounded by the Israeli military, based on the agency's reports.

Conflicting Accounts

Israel's armed services stated its forces had discharged cautionary rounds at individuals who came near them in a "threatening" way.

The organization declared there were no shooting events at the distribution centers and claimed the international organization of using "inaccurate and deceptive" figures from Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry.

Future Implications

The GHF's future had been indefinite since Palestinian factions and Israeli authorities consented a truce agreement to execute the primary segment of the American administration's peace initiative.

It said relief provision would take place "free from intervention from the two parties through the United Nations and its agencies, and the international relief society, in combination with other international institutions not connected in any way" with militant groups and the Israeli government.

United Nations representative the UN spokesman stated recently that the organization's termination would have "zero effect" on its operations "as we never partnered with them".

The spokesperson additionally stated that while increased relief was entering the region since the ceasefire took effect on 10 October, it was "inadequate to satisfy all requirements" of the 2.1 million population.